STE WILLIAMS

Attacks Rise On Network ‘Blind’ Spot

Mar
28
Interop speaker says DDoS attacks are not the only forms of abuse on the Domain Name Server.

The most high-profile attacks on Domain Name Service (DNS) servers are distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, but there are even more nefarious attacks on these systems underway today as cyber criminals and APT actors abuse commonly vulnerable DNS servers.

“DNS has been around forever. But there’s an overwhelming lack of expertise” in it, says Patrick Foxhoven, vice president and CTO of emerging technologies at Zscaler. “It’s been thought of as a dumb, foundational-level protocol. I believe it’s a blind area of many networks that’s often never looked at from a security point of view.”

Foxhoven, who will deliver a presentation next week at Interop 2014 in Las Vegas on this very topic, says DDoS attacks may be the most well known abuses of DNS servers, but malware owners and authors are increasingly using it to build out their command-and-control infrastructures. “More modern threats continue to come up with unique ways… to tunnel out of networks or exfiltrate data,” says Foxhoven, who will detail these threats in his “Forget Sticks and Stones: DNS Threats Prove Names Can Hurt You” presentation on Wednesday.

DNS reflection attacks are where attackers use bots to send domain name requests to DNS servers such that the servers end up flooding a targeted domain with responses, which can slow or crash both DNS servers and the targeted domain.

One of the largest DDoS attacks on record — 300 Gbit/s of traffic — was against volunteer spam-filtering organization Spamhaus in March of 2013.  The attackers abused improperly configured or default-state DNS servers, known as open DNS resolvers. Since DNS servers are large and run on high-speed Internet connections, the attackers were able to maximize a bigger bandwidth attack with fewer machines.

Ironically, the DNSSEC protocol that digitally signs domains can make DNS reflection attacks worse, Foxhoven says. “DNSSEC adds more data, so a reflection attack can be worse.” That’s because DNSSEC’s digital signing of DNS domains and authenticating responses in queries to the DNS amplifies the replies if the DNS is spoofed, he says.

DNS hijacking also has become a popular method for hacktivists such as the Syrian Electronic Army, which last year exploited DNS security weaknesses to redirect visitors to websites of The New York Times and Twitter, to their own website with messages supporting Bashar Assad’s government.

Botnet operators use fast-flux in their networks of zombies, which is basically load-balancing with a twist. It’s a round-robin method where infected bot machines serve as proxies or hosts for malicious websites. These are constantly rotated, changing their DNS records to prevent their discovery by researchers, ISPs, or law enforcement.

“It can cripple the infrastructure and do a denial-of-service on the organization, too,” Foxhoven says. “So if a company is infected with a botnet and the first sign is that their DNS servers are falling over, they are overwhelmed with load from fast-fluxing.”

Foxhoven says cyber espionage actors are the newest adopters of fast-flux. “We’re seeing DNS as the most common way these advanced-threat actors are phoning home… That was not the case two years ago.”

There are some best-practices that organizations can employ to help protect their DNS infrastructures. “Configure servers so that they only allow recursion from your enterprise or users, not from the [external] Internet,” says Foxhoven. And get visibility and analysis into what’s going on in the DNS, he adds, using behavioral analysis products like those of FireEye’s or Palo Alto Networks’ or cloud-based offerings such as that of Zscaler’s.

Still missing from the equation, however, is security for the “last mile,” Foxhoven says. “There’s a misunderstanding of what DNSSEC is meant to do. The last mile is still vulnerable: so if you have a laptop in an uncontrolled network, at Starbucks or a home network, you don’t have strong security for making sure that laptop is getting the [domain name resolution] results… coming from the server it should be coming from and not been tampered with along the way.”

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Senior Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise Magazine, … View Full Bio

Article source: http://www.darkreading.com/analytics/attacks-rise-on-network-blind-spot/d/d-id/1141552?_mc=RSS_DR_EDT

Comments

Comments are closed.