STE WILLIAMS

Which Security Metrics Should I Use?

Figuring that out actually begins with a broader question.

Question: I’m updating my security metrics program. Are there any old security metrics that I should definitely leave behind?

Stacey Halota, vice president, information security and privacy, at Graham Holdings: That depends. The best question to ask yourself as you update (or create) a metrics program is, “Why am I measuring this?” When you examine your metrics, are they driving desired change in your organization or helping maintain a desired control envionment? Do you have too many detailed metrics so that the message gets lost when reporting?  If the answer to the first question is no and the second is yes, those metrics should be re-evaluated. 

I have found that a few selected metrics that drive change are the most effective. For example, a metric that reports if Web application vulnerabilities are not fixed in the time frame mandated by our policy is helpful in keeping our websites secure. Metrics that mandate that a sensitive data inventory is performed each year help us to secure the data and comply with laws like GDPR. It is also useful to report metrics to senior management for accountability.   

What do you advise? Let us know in the Comments section, below.

Do you have questions you’d like answered? Send them to [email protected].

Stacey Halota joined Graham Holdings Company (then The Washington Post Company) in 2003. She leads the development and implementation of information security and privacy programs, including Sarbanes Oxley, privacy law, Payment Card Industry compliance, and other data … View Full Bio

Article source: https://www.darkreading.com/edge/theedge/which-security-metrics-should-i-use/b/d-id/1335586?_mc=rss_x_drr_edt_aud_dr_x_x-rss-simple

Asset Management Becomes the New Security Model

While security pros once rallied around end-device management as their organizing principle, that approach is being subsumed by asset management, according to Dean Sysman, CEO and Co-Founder of Axonius. Device management becomes a subset of asset management, as organizations create a hierarchy to protect what’s most valuable to them, he adds.

Article source: https://www.darkreading.com/asset-management-becomes-the-new-security-model/v/d-id/1335601?_mc=rss_x_drr_edt_aud_dr_x_x-rss-simple

5 Identity Challenges Facing Today’s IT Teams

To take control over your company’s security, identify and understand the biggest identity and access management challenges facing IT teams today and start addressing them.

The business landscape is transforming, along with a workforce that is increasingly modernizing where and how they want to work. Employees expect access to the tools they need anytime, from any device. As a result, IT teams are increasingly challenged to manage remote employees, give out user access, and secure company data. The hardest part is balancing multiple, often competing, priorities of reducing cost, user experience, efficiency, and effectiveness, as well as security.

To take control over the security of your organization, it’s important to identify and understand the biggest identity and access management challenges facing IT teams today and how to start addressing them. 

1. Managing a Digital Workforce
Now that millennials make up a larger portion of the workforce, the turnover rate has increased. That brings challenges for IT, including more time spent setting up new employees with computers and access to work-essential applications, increased pressure to complete this setup quickly so the employee can focus on valuable work, and the need to securely manage and control access from the start.

This modern workforce is mobile and remote, so employees expect access to their apps and devices from anywhere. IT must find a way to determine who is accessing what data, on which device, on which network. Each new touchpoint opens the door to increased risk, especially those third-party apps not approved or set up by IT, so it’s vital that access is securely managed.

2. Balancing Ease of Use and Security
When it comes to managing identity, two elements are at play. IT teams are focused on securing data and protecting the company from a data breach. On the other side, employees want to get their work done quickly and easily. Identity technology must manage each user identity in a way that meets these requirements of both ease of use and security. Any added tools and processes just add complexity to employees’ workday, which affects productivity, while reduced security opens the business up to risk of breaches and insider threats.

Ease of use is particularly important and is even driving key business decisions — if a product doesn’t meet an end user’s standards, it won’t be used.

3. Prioritizing Passwords
Account lockouts, forced password resets, and regular password rotation can only lead to frustration. They’re also expensive and pull IT and employee resources away from day-to-day responsibilities. Recent research we sponsored found that, on average, IT teams spend four hours per week on password management-related issues alone and receive 96 password-related requests per month. In addition to the resource drain, this often results in employees resorting to poor practices such as password reuse, documenting passwords in a spreadsheet or note on a phone, and emailing or sharing passwords. Each weak or shared password presents a risk to the company; it can result in a data breach and loss of company data.

4. Addressing Gaps in Technology
As more employees bring new tools into the workplace, IT can get left out of the loop on critical applications that entire teams may use to manage company data. This on top of juggling numerous approved tools and apps — including legacy, on-premises, cloud and mobile apps — makes it difficult for IT to know which are in use within the business, leaving them unable to protect the company data within.

Having the right tools in place enables IT to set up a more holistic security system and maintain that system going forward. Recent research shows that rather than investing in piecemeal solutions, 93% of IT professionals agree that bringing the various aspects of identity and access management under one solution would greatly benefit the overall security of the organization.

5. Determining the Costs of Applications and Services
When budgets and employee resources are tight, justifying the investment for additional security tools isn’t always easy. IT teams feel pressure to find the most cost-effective solution that optimizes both user experience and security, without utilizing too many resources.

Not investing in security really isn’t an option, given that costs to a business could be even greater. The average total cost of a data breach in the United States last year was nearly $8 million, and 82% of IT professionals in our recent survey said their business was exposed to a risk as a result of poor identity and access management practices, including loss of employee data (36%), loss of customer data (33%), and financial losses (26%), to name a few.

Take Control of Your Organization’s Security
To manage identity in your organization, first identify what success looks like and set goals. Having goals means you can present them to stakeholders to ensure you’re all on the same page. Next, look at the systems in use at your company; are they cloud, homegrown, on-premises? Determine which ones you’re committed to keeping versus those you want to replace. Once your goals and parameters are set, you need a team with a stake in success — this includes both leadership buy-in and employees from across departments who can test the solution for ease of use. While these five challenges exist, with the right solution in place, managing access and increasing security is simple.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading’s new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today’s top story: “You Gotta Reach ‘Em to Teach ‘Em.

John Bennett serves as Senior VP and General Manager of LogMeIn’s Identity and Access Management business unit. In this role, he is responsible for the general management and business development of all LogMeIn IAM products, including market-leading password manager, … View Full Bio

Article source: https://www.darkreading.com/endpoint/authentication/5-identity-challenges-facing-todays-it-teams/a/d-id/1335488?_mc=rss_x_drr_edt_aud_dr_x_x-rss-simple

Secureworks Pushes Human Intelligence, Machine Learning to Work Together








This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.



To InformationWeek
Network Computing
Dark Reading





Dark Reading | Security | Protect The Business - Enable Access

Search

Eschewing the either-or approach with machine learning, security operations centers must learn to identify and exploit the best of both approaches according to Secureworks’ Tim Vidas and Nash Borges. Taken together, human and machine intelligence can be a force multiplier against human cyber adversaries, they say.



‘);
}



‘);
}

Comments

News

News

News

Register for Dark Reading Newsletters

Live Events

Webinars

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

3 Comments

4 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments


Cartoon

Latest Comment: (Thinks) There’s no way they will guess [email protected] now!

7 Threats Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of CybersecurityThis Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.

Reports

The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations

The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations

Your enterprise’s cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Here’s some insight on what’s working – and what isn’t – in the data center.

Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report

googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-961777897907396673-15’);
});

Information Week
<!–
UBM DeusM
–>

UBM Tech



SafeGuard Cyber Adds Security, Compliance Capabilities for WeChat

A lack of visibility into the app could expose business users to compliance risks and security threats, the company says.

Safeguard Cyber today debuted new security protections for WeChat, integrating the app into its NextGen Compliance platform. Enterprise users will be able to apply real-time policy monitoring, and automated archiving and retention, to their WeChat conversations.

WeChat has more than a billion daily active users and about 80% use it for business, SafeGuard Cyber reports. Western companies doing business in China have found it’s necessary to chat with local employees, suppliers, and customers. The problem is, WeChat doesn’t offer much visibility and could expose organizations to compliance risks and cyber threats. Companies don’t have a way to detect malicious links, for example, and US businesses must maintain a “system of record” to remain compliant with the SEC, FINRA, HIPAA, and Chinese regulations.

When authorized by an account owner, the platform can capture data sent and received via WeChat: recipient names, direct message conversation threats, and content types including videos, audio messages, files, and shared contacts. It can follow posted links to external web pages, capture content, and screenshot them. All the data it captures is indexed for search and discovery, and it can be exported. The content may be subject to retention rules, which may vary based on an organization’s needs. SafeGuard Cyber can’t access login credentials.

“WeChat is too big to ignore if you want to do business in China,” SafeGuard Cyber CTO and co-founder Otavio Freire said in a statement. “However, too many companies struggle with opting in to the app securely. Understanding how to empower employees to safely use WeChat is critical for protecting employees, securing sales communications, maintaining compliance, and even driving business insights.”

Read more details here.

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading’s new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today’s top story: You Gotta Reach Em to Teach Em.

Dark Reading’s Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Article source: https://www.darkreading.com/risk/safeguard-cyber-adds-security-compliance-capabilities-for-wechat/d/d-id/1335607?_mc=rss_x_drr_edt_aud_dr_x_x-rss-simple

Disgruntled bug-hunter drops Steam zero-day to get back at Valve for refusing him a bounty

A security bod angry at Valve’s handling of bug reports has released a zero-day vulnerability affecting the games giant’s flagship Steam app.

Russia-based bug hunter Vasily Kravets said that he was releasing details of the flaw, an elevation of privilege error, after a series of poor interactions with Valve and HackerOne led to him getting banned from the Valve bug bounty program.

The way Kravets tells is (Valve did not respond to a request for comment), the whole saga started earlier this month when he went to report a separate elevation of privilege flaw in Steam Client, the software gamers use to purchase and run games from the games service.

Valve declined to recognize and pay out for the bug, which they said required local access and the ability to drop files on the target machine in order to run and was therefore not really a vulnerability.

“I received a lot of feedback. But Valve didn’t say a single word, HackerOne sent a huge letter and, mostly, kept silence,” Kravets wrote. “Eventually things escalated with Valve and I got banned by them on HackerOne – I can no longer participate in their vulnerability rejection program (the rest of H1 is still available though).”

Now, some two weeks later, Kravets has discovered and disclosed a second elevation of privilege flaw. Like the first, this flaw (a DLL loading vulnerability) would require the attacker to have access to the target’s machine and the ability to write files locally.

Guy pwning scrubs in video game on PC

Get rekt: Two years in clink for game-busting DDoS brat DerpTrolling

READ MORE

If those requirements are met, Kravets said, the attacker could get the Steam app to load and execute malicious DLL files, potentially giving an even greater control over the system and allowing the attacker to further download and install all sorts of malware on the target PC.

While neither flaw would be considered a “critical” risk as they each require the attacker to already have access to the target machine (if that’s the case you’re already in serious trouble, so what’s another flaw), Kravets argues that since it is a marketplace for third-party code, Steam in particular would be an attractive target with an elevated risk from EoP flaws.

“It is rather ironic that a launcher, which is actually designed to run third-party programs on your computer, allows them to silently get a maximum of privileges,” the bug-hunter notes. “Are you sure that a free game made of garbage by an unknown developer will behave honestly?” ®

Article source: http://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/22/steam_zeroday_valve/

Finally. Thanks so much, nerds. Google, Apple, Mozilla end government* internet spying for good

On Wednesday, Google, Apple, and Mozilla said their web browsers will block the Kazakhstan root Certificate Authority (CA) certificate – following reports that ISPs in the country have required customers to install a government-issued certificate that enables online spying.

According to the University of Michigan’s Censored Planet project, the country’s snoops “recently began using a fake root CA to perform a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack against HTTPS connections to websites including Facebook, Twitter, and Google.”

A root CA certificate can, to put it simply, be abused to intercept and access otherwise protected communication between internet users and websites.

The Censored Planet report indicates that researchers first detected data interception on July 17, a practice that has continued intermittently since then (though discussions of Kazakhstan’s possible abuse of root CA certificates date back several years).

The interception does not appear to be widespread – it’s said to affect only 459 (7 per cent) of the country’s 6,736 HTTPS servers. But it affects 37 domains, largely social media and communications services linked to Google, Facebook, and Twitter domains, among others.

Kazakhstan has a population of 18m and 76 per cent internet penetration, according to advocacy group Freedom House, which rates it 62 on a scale of 100 for lack of internet freedom – 100 means no internet access.

Two weeks ago, the government of Kazakhstan said it had discontinued its internet surveillance scheme, initially justified as a way to improve cybersecurity, after lawyers in the country criticized the move.

In notifications to Kazakhstani telecom customers, mobile operators maintained that the government-mandated security certificate represented a lawful demand. Yet, in a statement on August 6, the National Security Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan said the certificate requirement was just a test, and a successful one at that. And the committee provided instructions for removing the certificate from Android, iOS and Windows devices.

In 2015, Kazakhstan tried to get its root CA certificate into Mozilla trusted root store program but was rebuffed, and then tried to get its citizens to install the cert themselves until thwarted by legal action.

“As far as we know, the installation of the certificate is not legally required in Kazakhstan at this time,” a Mozilla spokesperson said in an email to The Register.

“The government has said that installing the cert is a voluntary measure that is meant to protect people’s security. There’s no evidence to suggest that’s true. Quite the opposite. We’ve seen this certificate used to intercept communications, which is why we took action to block the certificate and protect the privacy and security of our users.”

Mozilla recently took similar anti-surveillance action to prevent online spying in the United Arab Emirates.

Fox licks his chops. Photo by Shutterstock

Mozilla boots alleged snoop troupe from its root cert coop: UAE-based DarkMatter thrown onto CA blocklist

READ MORE

Google, Apple and Mozilla, find such behavior unacceptable, at least when it comes to a government without much international power. Recall Google was planning to develop a censored search engine for mainland China until employee objections derailed the project.

“People around the world trust Firefox to protect them as they navigate the internet, especially when it comes to keeping them safe from attacks like this that undermine their security,” said Marshall Erwin, senior director of trust and security at Mozilla in a statement. “We don’t take actions like this lightly, but protecting our users and the integrity of the web is the reason Firefox exists.”

Google in its statement sounded similarly indignant. “We will never tolerate any attempt, by any organization – government or otherwise – to compromise Chrome users’ data. We have implemented protections from this specific issue, and will always take action to secure our users around the world,” said Parisa Tabriz, senior engineering director for Chrome.

“Apple believes privacy is a fundamental human right, and we design every Apple product from the ground up to protect personal information,” Cook Co told The Register. “We have taken action to ensure the certificate is not trusted by Safari and our users are protected from this issue.” ®

Article source: http://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/21/kazakstan_snooping_blockade/

The Joy of Six… critical security patches: Cisco small biz switches open to hijacking via web UI

Cisco has emitted a fresh round of software updates to address security holes in its network switches and controllers.

Switchzilla’s latest patch bundle includes six alerts for what it rates as critical issues, including flaws in its Small Business 220 Series switches and UCS Director software. Combined with Cisco’s fixes for ‘high’ and ‘moderate’ issues, the networking giant posted a total of 33 security alerts on Wednesday.

For the Small Business 220 Switches, a pair of patches address CVE-2019-1912, an authentication bypass flaw that lets an attacker inject a reverse shell through the web interface, and CVE-2019-1913, an remote code (as root) execution flaw also exploitable through the switch’s web management interface without any authentication.

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists for both flaws, we’re told, though Cisco says there are no reports of active malicious exploitation in the wild… yet. The holes were found and reported by an infosec bod using the handle bashis.

Also considered a top priority are four critical patches for vulnerabilities in Cisco’s Unified Communications Service. Three of the patches (CVE-2019-1938, CVE-2019-1974, and CVE-2019-1937) address authentication bypass flaws that would let an attacker get administrator privileges for UCS Director. A fourth UCS Director flaw, CVE-2019-1935, concerns default credentials that were left active.

Other notable patches include a fix for CVE-2019-1649, a Secure Boot flaw that would let an attacker with local access tamper with the firmware of ASA and Firepower switches, as well as more than 140 router models and several voice and unified communications devices.

jail free

Breaker, breaker. Apple’s iOS 12.4 update breaks jailbreak break, un-breaks the break. 10-4

READ MORE

Cisco is also taking the occasion to issue its patch for the Key Negotiation over Bluetooth (KNOB) security issue that was disclosed earlier this month. Switchzilla’s CVE-2019-9506 fix applies to Webex and IP phones that rely on encrypted Bluetooth connections that are susceptible to an attack where an interceptor would potentially be able to trick devices into issuing easy-to-crack wireless encryption keys.

Cisco’s Integrated Management Controller was a popular target this go-round, as Switchzilla addressed 14 different updates for the tool including privilege escalation (CVE-2019-1863), information disclosure (CVE-2019-1908), and denial of service (CVE-2019-12634.)

Admins are advised to test and install the patches as soon as possible. ®

Article source: http://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/22/cisco_patch_bundle/

Silence APT Group Broadens Attacks on Banks, Gets More Dangerous

Over the past year, the financial damage linked to the Russian-speaking threat group has spiked fivefold, Group-IP says.

The Russian-language-speaking Silence APT group appears to be evolving into a major threat to banks and financial institutions everywhere, but especially so in Asia, Europe, Russia, and the former Soviet Union states.

Singapore-based security firm Group-IB, which has been tracking Silence since 2016, says over the past year the threat group has sharply increased the frequency of its attacks, begun targeting organizations in over two dozen countries, and added new weapons to its malware arsenal.

Some of the malware it has begun using suggests a link with TA505, a threat group perhaps best known for distributing the Dridex banking Trojan and other malware via very high-volume spam campaigns, Group-IB said this week. 

Between last September, when Group-IB first released a detailed report on Silence APT, and now, confirmed total financial losses stemming from the group’s activities has surged fivefold — from around $800,000 to $4.2 million, the security firm said.

Rustam Mirkasymov, threat intelligence expert at Group-IB, says Silence has evolved from being a mistake-prone, copycat group to one of the most sophisticated threat actors targeting organizations in the financial sector in Russia, Europe, and especially Asia.

“Given that the gang represents a growing threat to the financial sector worldwide, banks and financial organizations need to be aware of the threat,” he says. “Know their tactics and rapidly evolving tools to be able to detect and prevent the gang’s attacks at early stages.”  

Silence APT’s typical modus operandi has been to try and gain initial access to a target bank network via malware embedded in phishing emails. It has then used that foothold to look for and plant malware on banking systems that allow money mules to later make fraudulent withdrawals from the bank’s ATMs.

In one such campaign earlier this year, the group is believed to have stolen some $3 million from Dutch-Bangla Bank’s ATMs. In other attacks, the Silence APT group has similarly fraudulently withdrawn hundreds of thousands of dollars from banks in India, Russia, Bulgaria, and other nations.

Since October 2018, Group-IB researchers have observed the Silence APT group employ a new tactic for deploying its initial malware. Before sending out malware-laden phishing emails, the group has been sending out malware-free reconnaissance emails to intended targets to ensure the emails work and to also gather information on any antivirus tools being used. Group-IB researchers observed at least three campaigns over the last year in which Silence sent out tens of thousands of these recon emails to banks in a wide swath of countries, including Malaysia, Singapore, China, and Indonesia.

“Silence usually spends a little more time at the preparation stage than other financially motivated cybercriminals do,” Mirkasymov says. “[They] are extremely motivated and are willing to try out new tools and tactics,” typically after first carefully studying how other groups are using them, he says.

New Tools, New Capabilities
Among the new tools the group has begun using over the past year is a fileless loader written in PowerShell called Ivoke; EDA, another malicious PowerShell tool based on the Empire PowerShell post-exploitation agent; and xfs-disp.exe, a Trojan for attacking ATMs.

The Silence group has also encrypted and completely changed the execution logic of TruBot, its main malware downloader. In addition, the group has changed the communication protocol for communications between infected systems and the command-and-control server.

A lot of the changes appear to have been inspired by the growing attention that the APT actor has been receiving from the research community recently. “Silence has made a number of changes to their toolset with one goal: to complicate detection by security tools,” Mirkasymov said.

Group-IB has previously described Silence APT as starting out as a relatively unsophisticated two-person outfit — one with knowledge of banking systems and the other skilled at reverse-engineering and building malware. Their tactics and actions suggested they were either working in legitimate information security roles or had previously worked in one when they launched their criminal operations, Group-IB has previously assessed.

Since then, Silence appears to have rapidly grown, based on the frequency and the expanded geography of its attacks, Mirkasymov says. In addition, Silence sometimes relies on third-party developers, which indicates the group has an extensive list of contacts in underground markets, he notes.

“We assess with high confidence that Silence will continue enhancing their arsenal and increasing frequency and scale of their attacks worldwide,” he says.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading’s new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today’s top story: “How to Avoid Technical Debt in Open Source Projects.”

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year … View Full Bio

Article source: https://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/silence-apt-group-broadens-attacks-on-banks-gets-more-dangerous/d/d-id/1335596?_mc=rss_x_drr_edt_aud_dr_x_x-rss-simple

New FISMA Report Shows Progress, Gaps in Federal Cybersecurity

No major incidents mixed with continuing gaps in implementation paint an improving, but still muddy, picture of cybersecurity in the federal government.

Each year, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is required to report to Congress on the state of federal cybersecurity, as per the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA). The latest version of the report, for fiscal 2018, is mostly filled with the sort of information common in previous versions — with one big exception: For the first time since “major incident” was defined, not even one was reported.

That’s not to say there were no cybersecurity incidents. In fact, 31,107 were reported in 2018 — but even that number is a 12% decrease from the 35,277 incidents reported in fiscal year 2017.

Kiersten Todt, managing director of the Cyber Readiness Institute, believes investments in government security seem to be paying off. “I do think we have comprehensively, in both government and industry, been more effective in taking a risk management approach to cybersecurity, focusing on prevention when possible and resiliency — defined as minimizing disruption — when an incident does occur,” she says.

As noted, cybersecurity incidents against federal IT continue. The report notes email remains a top attack vector, with 6,930 incidents reported in 2018. These targeted phishing attacks are no surprise to Sean Finnegan, vice president, federal services, at Coalfire. “It is unlikely there has been a reduction in the number of threat actors and more probable the sophistication of attacks has increased, resulting in a smaller volume with the same level of risk,” he says.

The shift may reflect actions of the government as much as changes in criminal priorities. “This could be an indication that the government is improving defense of low-level attacks and threat actors are adapting their tactics to be more focused,” Finnegan explains.

While the report contains individual assessments of incidents at 97 agencies, ranging from the American Battle Monuments Commission to the Department of Homeland Security, the aggregated statistics show the government as a whole has yet to meet the implementation targets established by FISMA. Best results came in implementing privileged network access management, where agencies showed, on average, they have hit 94% of the target goal, and 96% of the mobile asset management goal.

The worst performance is in software asset management, where the 58% implementation average is down from 69% in FY 2017. “The federal government is assuredly getting better,” says Phil Reitinger, president and CEO at the Global Cyber Alliance. “But so are the bad guys — and they do not take summers off. Incidents also may not have been discovered yet.”

Even within the incidents reported, many observers are concerned about gaps, one of which is in fully understanding the threats against federal systems. In 27% of the reported incidents, no attack vector could be identified.

Another area of ongoing concern is the security of contractors and other third parties with legitimate access to federal systems and data. “There have also been successful attacks leveraged against government contractors,” says Terence Jackson, CISO at Tycotic. “The malicious actors are targeting the weaker links in the supply chain.” Tthe report also notes significant disparities in the state of contractor security for different agencies.

Still, the report is seen as progress by most. And based on budgets, cybersecurity remains a priority within the federal government, with nearly $15 billion set to be invested in non-classified security for fiscal year 2018.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading’s new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today’s top story: “How to Avoid Technical Debt in Open Source Projects.”

 

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and … View Full Bio

Article source: https://www.darkreading.com/threat-intelligence/new-fisma-report-shows-progress-gaps-in-federal-cybersecurity/d/d-id/1335597?_mc=rss_x_drr_edt_aud_dr_x_x-rss-simple